You Want Fries With That? Hardee's Manager Forces Employee To Have Sex
Q. 930. What is the third?
A. Oppressing of the poor, which is a cruel, tyrannical, and unjust dealing with inferiors.
Q. 931. What other proof have you of that?
A. Out of Exod. xxii. 21. “Ye shall not hurt the widow and the fatherless: If you do hurt them, they will cry unto me, and I will hear them cry, and my fury shall take indignation, and I will strike thee with the sword.” And out of Isa. x. 1, 2. “Wo to them that make unjust laws, that they might oppress the poor in judgment, and do violence to the cause of the humble of my people.” Q. 932. What is the fourth?
A. To defraud working men of their wages, which is to lessen, or detain it from them.
Q. 933. What proof have you of it?
A. Out of Eccl. xxxiv. 37. “He that sheddeth blood and he that defraudeth the hired man, are brethren,” and out of James v. 4. “Behold the hire of the workmen that have reaped your fields, which is defrauded by you, crieth, and their cry hath entered into the ears of the Lord God of Sabbath.”
A former fast food waiter is suing Hardee’s restaurant chain, claiming his supervisor pressured him into a sexual relationship and fired him when he ended it. Gerald Anderson alleged manager Danielle Dahlenburg hired him in August 2012 and subjected him to 'unwanted sexual advances, requests for sexual favors and sexual touching', according to court documents filed on February 5. The South Dakota man claims he had sex with Dahlenburg for at least two months because she led him to believe it was a job requirement.'When she hired him, Dahlenburg told plaintiff that if he 'applied' himself and worked with her 'on and off the clock' he could advance to a management position,' the suit alleges. 'Dahlenburg led plaintiff to believe that his submission to her sexual advances was a condition of his employment and that he would be fired, or otherwise retaliated against, if he did not acquiesce.' Daily Mail Read More>>>>>